About those LAUSD iPads…

About those LAUSD iPads…

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Another reader of K12NN writes in to say:

“If you think that LAUSD is paying too much for the iPads, then what are the alternatives?

Many would think that a Surface Pro (the Surface RT has too little horsepower) would be the way to go.

But now Micro$oft would pay $200 to any iPad switcher:

Microsoft will pay iPad users at least $200 to switch to Surface

Doesn’t it give you pause that the market has spoken and buying 600,000+ Surfaces instead of iPads just because Micro$oft gives a heavy discount would be a losing proposition?

If it weren’t for the cost, I’d think this is a good idea. Paying for it from bonds is not.

OTOH, I don’t think it will change much in the long run unless they could prove that it will vastly improve learning. They should have piloted this with a very serious underwriting from the technology/software vendors. Why should schools have to pay to conduct a test of their products which are not yet ready for prime time as far as the educational market is concerned? To date, I don’t believe that there is one properly conducted study that says that learning is enhanced by using current off-the-shelf technology.”

——–

Agreed — why are tablets the end-all, be-all?

This isn’t about fostering better computer literacy in children. This is about being better able to administer Common Core State Standards tests, which are computer-based.

But as it turns out, the iPads weren’t sufficiently useable unless keyboards were added to make them so.

Lest anyone forget, the iPad is essentially a big iPhone — the two share the iOS system. Unless you specifically load certain apps, it lacks several key functions that an Apple or other laptop has. There’s a lot that can be done with a souped-up iPad but it’s still NOT the same as a laptop.

You get the feeling that the LAUSD procurement process is haphazard, not well informed about available hardware, not entirely competitive, and lacks a comprehensive vision of what children are supposed to be doing to become computer literate. Buying a device is not the same as fleshing out a vision and making the necessary purchases to carry out the vision.

facebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedinrssyoutube
Avatar of admin

Related Posts

UWGLA executives Ryan Smith and Jason Mandell. Photo credit LA Times, converted into a fair use meme by this article's author.
ucla2014-tshirt

United Way’s Corporate NPIC Astroturf was thick in front of LAUSD last Tuesday

VAM/AGT and other neoliberal corporate reforms have all scientific validity of phrenology. They're just as racist as well.

American Statistical Association has just released a very important document on Value Added Methodologies

Local Control Funding Formula Accountability Councils — Did You Get the Memo?

Local Control Funding Formula Accountability Councils — Did You Get the Memo?

Real Technological Literacy for Public School Kids Instead of iPads for Tests or Code.org
Robot_by_Diwaker_playingball

Real Technological Literacy for Public School Kids Instead of iPads for Tests or Code.org

Leave a Reply